πŸ”₯ Ship your first app in 2 minutes β€” free Lovable course in CBV Academy
Start Free Course β†’
Skip to content
codingbutvibes

Lindy vs Make (2026): AI Agents vs Workflow Automation

Lindy and Make solve different automation problems. Make handles deterministic workflows: if X, then Y. Lindy handles conversations: agents that email, call, chat, and use memory. Make is workflow automation. Lindy is agent automation. Most teams use both.

Updated: April 2026 β€’ CodingButVibes Research

Quick Verdict: Lindy vs Make (2026)

Pick Lindy if you're building agents that email, call, or chat with humans or systems. Lindy is built for conversational automation where the agent needs memory and judgment.

Pick Make if you're automating deterministic workflows: if X, then Y. Make excels at visual scenario building with complex branching. Use it for data-driven automation, not conversation.

Our pick for most people in 2026: Lindy for agents; Make for workflows. Lindy is fundamentally different β€” agents with memory. Make is fundamentally workflows. They often work together, not against each other. Use Lindy to decide, Make to execute.

βš™οΈ

Free Course

Build Voice AI Agents with Lindy

Hands-on lessons. Build a real project. Lesson 1 is free β€” no signup needed.

Start Learning Free β†’

TL;DR β€” Quick Decision Guide

Pick Lindy if…

  • You need agents that can email or call on your behalf
  • You want agents to have memory across conversations
  • You're automating tasks that require judgment, not just rules
  • You want AI to chat with humans and handle edge cases
  • Your team is ready for agentic automation, not just workflows
LLindy

Lindy

New

15K+ workflows automated β€” handles your busywork 24/7

Users save 28 hours/week on email and scheduling. One consulting firm cut proposal turnaround from 1.5 weeks to 2 days.

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 400 tasks/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $49/mo

Pick Make if…

  • You're automating data pipelines or system-to-system workflows
  • Your automation rules are deterministic (if X, do Y)
  • You love visual scenario building and complex branching
  • You want the cheapest execution-based pricing
  • You don't need agent intelligence; you need reliable workflow execution
MMake.com

Make.com

Popular

500K teams run their entire operation on visual automation

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 1,000 ops/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $9/mo

Both are real tools. The right pick depends on what you’re actually building.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Real comparison criteria β€” pricing, what each does well, and where each one fails.

CriterionLindyMake
Primary use caseConversational agents with memoryDeterministic workflows
Can send emailsYes, nativelyOnly if you add Zapier/n8n
Can make callsYes, via integrationsNo, workflows only
Agent memoryYes, core featureNo, stateless workflows
Visual workflow builderNo, conversation-firstYes, excellent
Complex branchingAgent decides via AIRule-based visual routing
Startup cost$49.99/mo Plus$9/mo Core (annual)
Free tier400 tasks/month1,000 ops/month
Can run 24/7Yes, agents always onYes, scenarios always on
Judgment requiredYes, agents use AINo, rules-based only
Human touch pointCentral (agents talk to humans)Optional (workflows alone)
App integrationsEmail, calendar, messaging1,000+ apps via scenarios

Pricing in 2026

Lindy Pricing

Free$0/mo β€” 400 tasks/month
Plus$49.99/mo
Pro$99.99/mo
Max$199.99/mo

Plus at $49.99/mo is the working tier for individuals. Pro ($99.99/mo) for teams with more agent runs. Max ($199.99/mo) for heavy agentic automation. Free 400 tasks/month is a real trial.

Make Pricing

Free$0/mo β€” 1,000 ops/month
Core$9/mo (annual)
Pro$16/mo (annual)
Teams$29/mo (annual)

Core ($9/mo annual) is exceptional value. Pro ($16/mo annual) adds features. Make's credit model is far more forgiving than task-based pricing. Annual billing required for best rates.

Value verdict: Different tools for different jobs. Make is cheaper and better for workflows. Lindy is better for agents that need memory and judgment. Most teams use both: Lindy for decisions, Make for execution. Don't pick one over the other; pick both and layer them.

Lindy: In-Depth Analysis

What Lindy Does Best

Agents with memory and judgment

Lindy agents remember context across conversations. They can be given tools (email, calendar, messaging) and make decisions. This is fundamentally different from workflows. Workflows execute rules; agents navigate ambiguity.

Native email and call capabilities

Lindy agents can email or call on your behalf, with full conversation context. They can read your email, respond thoughtfully, and route complex requests. This is not available in workflow tools.

Conversation-first automation

Lindy is built around conversations with humans (or systems). Your agent can chat with customers, ask clarifying questions, escalate when needed. It's agent-first, not workflow-first.

LLindy

Lindy

New

15K+ workflows automated β€” handles your busywork 24/7

Users save 28 hours/week on email and scheduling. One consulting firm cut proposal turnaround from 1.5 weeks to 2 days.

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 400 tasks/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $49/mo

Where Lindy Loses

  • More expensive than Make per unit (Plus is $49.99/mo vs Make Core at $9/mo)
  • No visual workflow builder; you configure via conversation
  • Smaller app ecosystem than Make (though email/calendar/messaging are first-class)
  • Not ideal for pure data pipeline automation where workflows excel
  • Steeper learning curve for teams coming from traditional automation

Make: In-Depth Analysis

What Make Does Best

Visual scenario builder is the best in class

Make's scenario editor is exceptional for visual workflow design. Complex branching, nested conditions, and multi-path routing are intuitive. If you love building with your mouse, Make is unbeaten.

Execution-based pricing is far cheaper

At $9-16/mo annually, Make undercuts Lindy by 5-10x on cost. For high-volume deterministic workflows, Make's credit model is forgiving and predictable.

1,000+ app integrations

Make connects to 1,000+ apps via scenarios. You can build data pipelines, sync systems, and route information across your entire stack without touching Lindy.

MMake.com

Make.com

Popular

500K teams run their entire operation on visual automation

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 1,000 ops/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $9/mo

Where Make Loses

  • No agent memory or judgment; workflows are rule-based only
  • Cannot email or call on your behalf; you need Lindy or Zapier for that layer
  • Workflows are stateless; each execution is independent
  • Cannot handle ambiguous or judgment-heavy tasks; rules must be explicit
  • Not designed for conversational automation or human-agent interaction

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Lindy when…

  • You need agents to email or call on your behalf
  • You want agents to have memory and context across conversations
  • Your automation requires judgment and edge case handling
  • You're automating customer or partner interactions
  • You want 24/7 agentic presence handling your workflows

Choose Make when…

  • You're automating data pipelines or system-to-system workflows
  • Your automation rules are deterministic (if X, do Y)
  • You love visual scenario building and complex branching
  • Cost is a priority (Make is 5-10x cheaper than Lindy)
  • You want the most integrations (1,000+ apps) in one platform

How This Comparison Was Built

Research-based comparison, not a paid review. Pricing reflects Lindy Plus at $49.99/mo and Make Core at $9/mo annual (April 2026). Lindy's agent capabilities (email, calls, memory) reflect documented features. Make's scenario builder and app count reflect current product surfaces. Lindy is fundamentally agentic; Make is fundamentally workflow-based. Verify pricing on each vendor's site before committing.

Try Them in 30 Minutes

  1. Pick one feature you’d build for a real project
  2. Build it in Lindy first. Note time-to-working-state and the friction points
  3. Now build the same feature in Make. Compare the same milestones
  4. Look at what each output is missing if you tried to ship it tonight
LLindy

Lindy

New

15K+ workflows automated β€” handles your busywork 24/7

Users save 28 hours/week on email and scheduling. One consulting firm cut proposal turnaround from 1.5 weeks to 2 days.

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 400 tasks/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $49/mo

MMake.com

Make.com

Popular

500K teams run their entire operation on visual automation

βœ“ Free tier available

Free plan: 1,000 ops/mo, no CC required

Take the free Lindy course β†’

Paid from $9/mo

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Lindy and Make together?

Yes, and it's the right pattern. Use Lindy for agentic decisions and conversations. Use Make to execute the deterministic workflows your agent decides on. Lindy decides; Make executes.

Is Lindy better than Make?

No. They solve different problems. Lindy is for agents; Make is for workflows. If you need agents, Lindy wins. If you need workflows, Make wins. They often work together.

Can Make send emails like Lindy?

Make can send emails via integrations (Gmail, Sendgrid, etc.), but it can't hold conversations or send judgment-based emails like Lindy agents can. Lindy agents understand context and respond conversationally.

Does Lindy have a visual workflow builder?

Lindy is conversation-driven, not visual. You tell Lindy what you want, and it builds agents. Make is visual-first. Different paradigms for different minds.

Which is cheaper?

Make. Core is $9/mo annual; Lindy Plus is $49.99/mo. But they're not direct competitors. You're paying for agent intelligence on Lindy, not just workflow execution.

Can Lindy agents call people?

Yes, via integrations (phone APIs, voice services). Lindy agents can hold voice conversations, gather information, and route calls. This is rare in workflow tools.

When should I pick Lindy over Make?

When your automation involves judgment, memory, or conversation. Agents that understand nuance. When you need the agent to email you or your customer. When rules aren't enough.

Can I migrate from one to the other?

No direct migration because they solve different problems. You might use both in the same workflow stack: Lindy agents making decisions, Make workflows executing them.

βš™οΈ

Free Course

Build Voice AI Agents with Lindy

Hands-on lessons. Build a real project. Lesson 1 is free β€” no signup needed.

Start Learning Free β†’

Keep Reading

Agents and workflows solve different problems.

Lindy agents make decisions and talk to humans. Make workflows execute the rules. The right pattern is often both: Lindy agent decides, Make workflow executes. Learn how in our free Lindy course.

Take the free Lindy course β†’ Build something real this weekend

No signup needed for Lesson 1. The walkthrough includes deployment.